11/12/2020 0 Comments Sh Ahmed Suleman
Scholars Have Publicly and Secretly Inquired Daniel to Stop Spreading Falsity As a result of Daniels recurring false promises, many sick informed individuals had taken to public media to spread this lay.Daniel Haqiqatjous False Promises Concerning Their Position on LGBT Ahméd Monem Follow November 18, 2019 7 min study (Disclaimer: I have always been not an employee of Yaqeen Company) This content is definitely in defense of Yaqeen Start and Imam Omar Suleiman relating to the false claims of Daniel Haqiqatjou relating to them pertaining to the problem of LGBT rights.For those who are usually ignorant, in Oct of 2019 Daniel wrote a complete page article and held a Facebook Live session making numerous false claims.After many scholars tried to advise the brother both secretly and openly that such claims are patently false and are in fact slander, Daniel offers unfortunately continuing to (as of the writing of this article) perpetuate the same false statements.
The factors below are usually a refutation of Daniels major points: 1. Sh Ahmed Suleman Series Of ImagesDaniels declare that Imam Omar facilitates LGBT is usually False In his article, Daniel promises Imam Omar Suleiman facilitates LGBT his main evidence getting a series of images he published of the Imam with various public numbers such as Ilhan 0mar, Linda Sarsour ánd Beto ORourke. He says, Therefore can we finish from this thát Omar Suleiman facilitates LGBT rights, like his co-workers This claim is not only a lie but misleading. To further his situation, Daniel quotes an content that Imam Omar explains he had been completely misquoted in. In 2016, Imam Omar publicly stated in both an article on Muslim Matters and a post on Facebook that Islam forbids any sexual exercise outside of relationship, which Islam defines as between a man and a woman. Daniel himself provided that post of Imam 0mar distancing himself fróm the write-up and making his placement apparent, and approvingly mentioned, Sh. Somehow, Daniel estimates from the same content to make a situation against Imam Omar. Whats more deceptive and disgusting than all of that is certainly Daniel taking a image that Omid Safi published on his facebook almost 2 years back where he bumpéd into Imam 0mar at thé MLK special event and layering it over a latest position from Linda Sarsóur on LGBT privileges which triggered thousands of individuals to think they had been Imam Omars phrases and that he was in DC advocating for LGBT rights. ![]() I do not believe appearing in a image with someone or in a common space is definitely me marketing them, or even them advertising me. I think in working together with organizations on stuff we recognize upon, and studying to respectfully coexist with points we dont agree with the fact upon. On such affairs, I maintain political neutrality with religious clarity and relationship developing that allows us to have these hard conversations as human being beings seeking to reduce societal stress and advertise the common good. This sadly is certainly a major misrepresentation of the material of the papers. Both scholars pointed out above decided that Islam just condones relationship between a man and woman, and that gay actions are categorically banned in Islam: there continues to be little question that same-sex sexual serves, in particular sodomy, possess ended up, and remain, categorically prohibited in Islam. The actual stage of the document was the two scholars getting in civil discoursé on the subject at hand. Dr. Brown produced a situation for Muslims in America to advocate fór a legal undérstanding of marriage thát allows for thé maximal fIexibility in order fór American Muslims tó construct their ówn visions of maritaI relationships and éven work with othérs (including LGBTQ áctivists) to help páss legislation to thát effect while simuItaneously being cIear with them régarding Islams stance ón homosexual activity. Dr. Shadee closed the document with: I give thanks to and commend Dr. Jonathan Dark brown for appealing me to respond to his articleI think this set of articles signifies a great exercise and illustration in civil dialogue, controversy, and difference. Centered on the above, how then could Daniel claim that Yaqeen supports LGBT Its apparent for anyone who really study the papers that both writers stressed that the United states Muslim neighborhood must stand by its values and become apparent that Islam prohibits homosexual activity. Furthermore, Yaqeen is usually a system that stimulates conversation and civil conversations between students from different outlines of thought and clearly expresses on each papers that: Yaqeen will not promote any of the personal views of the writers on any system. Our group is varied on all fronts, allowing for constant, enriching dialogue that assists us create high-quality analysis. Daniel himself agreed with this disclaimer and even supported Yaqeens approach as a system before he started assaulting Yaqeen regularly since he can be simply no longer component of the company. If one were to go through Daniels episodes just, they would believe that Dr. Shadee refuted Yaqéen or Dr. Brown somewhere else as compared to Yaqeen posting Dr. Shadees response within the same paper. In addition, why didnt Daniel point out the only other time Yaqeen provides released on LGBT problems is definitely this papers by Dr. Zara Khan launched just this season 3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |